View Single Post
Old 03-16-2008, 07:32 PM   #2 (permalink)
shamaal
Insanely Moderate
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,645
I replied no, although I don't blame Bush the person.
I find fault with his administration's regulatory and legislative policies.

IMHO, Clinton had a good grasp of economics and stimulation and had an excellent treasury secretary; Bush1 had good economic sense but inherited a crummy economy; Reagan was pragmatic had sound economic advisors; Carter had an eye for detail but became overwhemed; Nixon had a good grasp but was distracted and Johnson had good advisors; Eisenhower kenw enough to leave well enough alone and had sound economic advisors; Truman managed best he could with what he had and Roosevelt was all over the place.
shamaal is online now   Reply With Quote